Review: Mission Workshop Rondel Sneaker

If someone asked me to describe the perfect shoe for my day to day lifestyle I might have described something almost exactly like the Rondel Sneaker. My wish list would be something like this:

A casual and good looking full leather sneaker with full leather upper and a stiff sole (i.e. it must have a shank), it would fit into toe clips should I want to use them for that, and perhaps be SPD compatible.

I wouldn’t have made comfort specifications but it should be comfortable and durable.

This new sneaker from Mission Workshop, based in San Francisco meets my basic description. Indeed it has a full leather upper, it looks good, it has a shank and it can take SPD cleats. I love the concept. This is a new product and as such your expectations should not be set to high. This shoe is as much casual as it is functional. Unfortunately, they do not come in half sizes and I had to choose between too tight and too loose. I had to go with too tight as the bigger size was unwearable. There is a ton of heal slop which is due, in part, to the stretchy laces; replace immediately (Black looks better anyway). Next I noticed the left shoe was tighter, which was odd since most commonly the right foot is bigger. I checked and I fit the norm, so I checked the shoes. The sole of the let shoe is an eighth of an inch shorter in my pair, size 45(11US). I contacted the company and received no reply. The shoes are made in China and perhaps quality control isn’t the best for this first run. I also noticed that the cleat tracks were in grossly different places on each shoe. Thankfully, the adjustment in the cleat could compensate for that. Depending on your size you may also find that you have to move the cleat as far to the inside as possible for the shoe to clear the crank-arm, kind of annoying. I even had to put pedal washers on one set of shimano SPDs. The construction of the shoe could stand for some more attention to detail.

Thankfully the shoes have stretched to some extent and are bearable. The leather quality seams spotty and I treated them with neutral shoe polish immediately. It didn’t take much rain to still put a nice wear mark on the toe (one day on the polo courts). The sole is a rip-off of a classic vans slip-on and I am sceptical about how it will hold up, but seems okay so far.

Overall, I am happy with the shoe because I can finally ride to the bar or restaurant and walk inside wearing exactly what I road there in and not look like I road there. The shoes mesh with my sense of style and I am pleased with the product. However, there isn’t much competition out there. You can pick up a hiking style shoe from almost any cycling shoe manufacturer for under one hundred dollar and the quality of the sole and the construction quality will likely be superior to the Rondel, but it won’t look half as cool. And lets face it fashion is just as important as function in the urban jungle.

-VBN 

Try IGH

Most bike nerds would argee that an internally geared hub is, in theory, the ideal set-up for touring. While discussion of the exact ranges of IGHs vs. traditional derailleur systems would make this post useful it is beyond the scope of this blog, for the moment. Suffice to say, that IGHs generally do not have as much range as derailleur systems and by virtue of their fewer speeds they have larger jumps between gears. The Rohloff hub is the most advanced to date, with 14 speeds it covers more range than any other IGH. You can also skew your hub to the high or low gear range based on your cog and chainring selection. Shimano and Sram are up to 11 speeds but still do not have quite the range of a Rohloff , but they are a fraction of the price. 

Recently, I had a customer who wanted to give his 8 speed Shimano Nexus IGH equipped bicycle more range. He is riding across Canada this year and does not want to lose his high gear to by skewing his hub to the low with alternative cog and chainring combinations as he will need them to cross British Columbia. He began to ask me lots of questions about what was possible with individual parts and at first I was reluctant to entertain him. My initial reaction was that what he wanted to do was unreasonable; he would be far better off purchasing bike with derailleurs, but that was before I knew he already owned the bike. So I suggested he returned with his bike before we took it any further. I looked at his bike and ordered the parts he wanted. This is what his bike looked like to start. On chainring, one cog and an eccentric bottom bracket to tension the chain.

What he wanted to do was add multiple chainrings so he decided on a triple and I brought in a Shimano Alfine chain tensioner, a triple front derailleur and a triple crank. He came up with a Shimano MTB shifter. Everything went together surprisingly smooth. I rotated the bottom bracket to the lowest position to make his center of gravity as low as possible for maximum loaded stability. Everything adjusted and a new chain installed, it worked surprisingly well. The shortfall of this retrofit is the jump between gears remains wider than an 8 speed cassette and there are high and low gears that he will never use because they are too extreme. I am also concerned about the torque that will be generated in the extremely low gears, but he was intent on the conversion so I made it happen. It was a fun job and a cool experiment. I had to use a clamp on housing stop for the front derailleur right about the bottom bracket to make it work and I must say it all turned out pretty clean.

-VBN